Connect with us

News

The Youth Crisis and our Collective Challenge

 

Kayode Oladele Esq

By: Kayode Oladele

Western discourses of the African youth are focused on the youth burg and the negative consequences the youth are posing to the continent. The challenge for them, just like with the population question, is how to contain the youth. On the part of the African political leadership there is utter hopelessness with the youth, hence the claim of a “lost generation”.

The youth have been debased and criminalized; they have been portrayed as a menace and social nuisance to society. They have been perceived as unfit and incapable of making useful contributions to the society because their values constitute an oddity. When the youth are discussed in social and economic terms, they are said to be the architects of their own misfortune. On the political turf, they are totally excluded from power. They are merely complimented as “leaders of tomorrow”.

In this paper, I try to argue that central to the understanding of the youth question is our collective failure and the question of youth marginalization.

The youth were central to nationalist struggles in the era of decolonization in Africa. Most of the African leaders that formed political parties in the twentieth century were all under forty years of age. In Nigeria, many of the First Republic Ministers were all under 35 years of age. M.T. Mbu, Maitama Sule, Richard Akinjide and Shehu Shagari were all under 35 years of age when they became Ministers. Yakubu Gowon was 32 years old bachelor when he assumed the reins of power in July 1966. It is true that we have a youth crisis.

However, I believe in the ability of the youth to renew themselves, the youth crisis is challenging in two contradictory ways- negatively and positively. While everybody has demonized and criminalized the youth, it is useful to view how the youth have been cultivating themselves positively and are using the crises to empower themselves in various ways.

Many young entrepreneurs have emerged, many artisans, farmers and cultural producers-musicians, song writers, movie producers, dancers, and so on. They are all doing well. We must acknowledge them, showcase and celebrate talents and innovations.

The Youth are also seizing the information age to be creative and they live in their own world. They are challenging us to the possibilities of their potentials and to the limits of our vision.

They are urging us not to draw a boundary for them because their standards are higher than the ones we set for ourselves. In demonizing our youth and speaking negatively about them all the time, we create generational and moral hubs which pose as a barrier and a divide.

Rather than embrace them, we despise them; unfortunately they equally see us as adults who are not appreciative and who do not wish to inspire or encourage them. This is not a funny ping-pong, it is an unfair value that we have ingrained in our cultural template. However, things have to change and things must change for the better. Just like there are bad adults so there are bad youths, just as the adults have potentials, the youth have even greater potentials. The gulf we create between the youth and the adults is most times, unmitigated and unnecessary.

It is unhelpful, it is not redemptive; rather it destructive. If the youth are bad, it is also because there is something fundamentally wrong with the society and those who manage it-this is the first thing elementary sociology teaches us. I am not moralizing; I am simply making a point in social cognitive development of people and the socialization processes. We learn, but we learn good or bad things; or we simultaneously learn good and bad things which mean we can apply either or both depending on the outcome we desire from our action.

However, whichever option we choose to apply depends on how society is structured and what it has to offer various social categories of people in society. We cannot abstract needs from deeds, action from cause. Every activity has its social origins and social consequences. This is how we should begin to relook the youth question. Let us all turn a new leave. If our children are bad, then we should examine ourselves and not blame our children for being bad. What went wrong and why? Have we done well in the training and upbringing of our children? Has the system done well in providing the infrastructure to support youth development? We must all honestly seek to answer these questions. We cannot shift the responsibility; neither can we be in denial. What have the adults done that made the youth sick of them? Let us for once turn the table and do a sober introspection of our actions. By far the greatest challenge the youth face today is that they do not have access to representation, they are completely marginalized. They are given token representation in politics. Others always speak on their behalf, and others represent them; those who represent them are mere pawns in the hands of those who constitute the established political status quo.

They therefore represent not the youth but the status quo that appointed them, while in government. Their social and ideological constituency is not the youth, they only figuratively answer being youth representatives. My point is that we perhaps too easily shift blame, or show impatience. We are too harsh on the youth and do not see what we ourselves as adults have done wrong to them. One way to approach the matter may be to detach ourselves from inherited stereotypes on the youth. Take for example the education sector. Can we truly say that the current crop of Nigerian students deserve what they get from our tertiary institutions? If we all went through the same kind of training, could we all have been so accomplished and empowered, in our various places of work? Today, there are many youths with talents, everywhere they went seeking employment they are told that they have “no experience” or “over aged” as though experience can be manufactured in a vacuum. Many youths who would wish to be in self-employment cannot secure soft loans or other forms of support including an enabling environment to pursue their desisted goals and ambitions. How much can we blame them for their subsequent decisions in life? At every point in time, we should not rush to condemn the youth, we should look inwards to what we have done wrong or what we have not done right to encourage, inspire, mentor and support the youth. We need to know that at every point in time the youth are socially differentiated and ideologically divided. They are divided by economic means, educational standards, expectations and values etc.

The youth are also divided by negative and positive demands, negative and positive activities. They are open to all sorts of possibilities and challenges, and towards what direction they move depends on a number of factors, some are internal to them and some are not, some can be blamed on parents, schools, churches and mosques, community leaders, politicians and so on. The youth are marginalized in many ways and in many spaces and sites, at home, school, religious and recreational sites and in the political arena. What this does is twofold; first, it denies them the opportunity to mature through mentoring and learning; second, it excludes them from political participation. We must realize that the youth have needs and how they think these needs can be met. We must hear them and create spaces and opportunities for them to express and experiment their ideas. If we block these spaces, it will only be at our perils.
The overarching basis for all this is the political exclusion of youth. The mega question is how can we bring them back-in? We should not shift blame or buck pass. If the youth have disappointed us, it is also because we have disappointed them; if we want the youth to change, we as adults must also change-it is a dialectical relationship.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply